[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120917145332.82a0a723c73904943190d493@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:53:32 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
Hi Dave,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c between commit 99d0b1db6ccd ("drm/i915:
initialize dpio_lock spin lock") from Linus' tree and commit c6a828d3269a
("drm/i915: move all rps state into dev_priv->rps") from the drm tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
index 914c0df,2c09900..0000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
@@@ -1586,8 -1606,7 +1606,8 @@@ int i915_driver_load(struct drm_device
spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->error_lock);
- spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->rps_lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->rps.lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->dpio_lock);
if (IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev) || IS_HASWELL(dev))
dev_priv->num_pipe = 3;
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists