lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120917104017.GB5401@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Sep 2012 06:40:18 -0400
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	"Opensource [Anthony Olech]" <anthony.olech.opensource@...semi.com>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Dajun Chen <david.chen@...semi.com>
Subject: Re: [NEW DRIVER V3 8/8] DA9058 REGULATOR driver

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:29:43AM +0000, Opensource [Anthony Olech] wrote:

> > Why is this function writing to the hardware, especially writing the same value
> > every time?

> the ramp_register is DA9058_SUPPLY_REG and it is marked as volitile.
> Writing to the ramp enable bit starts the voltage change. When the PMIC has
> finished making the change it resets the bit. Thus to make another voltage
> change the bit needs to be set again.

This function is retrieving the amount of time it would take to set the
voltage.  Why would it be starting a voltage ramp?  The fact that it's
not setting the new voltage in the hardware ought to be a warning sign
here...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ