linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] lockd: use per-net refrence-counted NSM clients

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50570052.8050205@parallels.com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:49:54 +0400
From:	Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
To:	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
CC:	"Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
	"bfields@...ldses.org" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...nvz.org" <devel@...nvz.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"jlayton@...hat.com" <jlayton@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] lockd: use per-net refrence-counted NSM clients

14.09.2012 23:10, Chuck Lever пишет:
>
> On Sep 14, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 13:01 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>> What happens if statd is restarted?
>>
>> Nothing unusual. Why?
>
> The NSM upcall transport is a potential application for TCP + softconn, now that a persistent rpc_clnt is used.  It just depends on what failure mode we'd like to optimize for.
>

I don't understand, where the problem is.
Could you be more specific, please?

-- 
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/