linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/11] KGDB/KDB FIQ (NMI) debugger

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120917113750.GA28838@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Sep 2012 04:37:50 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
	Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
	Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
	kernel-team@...roid.com, kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/11] KGDB/KDB FIQ (NMI) debugger

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 08:01:33AM -0700, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Here comes the lucky v7:
> 
> - Per Alan Cox's suggestion added hangup method and removed a small
>   leftover;
> - Per Colin Cross' suggestion moved IRQ quiescing logic into
>   poll_get_char routine. IIUC, Alan is less unhappy about it.  As a
>   result, clear_irq() callback dropped.
> 
> These patches can be found in the following repo (based on tty-next):
> 
> 	git://git.infradead.org/users/cbou/linux-nmi-kdb.git master
> 
> Old changelogs and rationale for these patches can be found here:
> 
> 	v1-v5, rationale: http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/10/2
> 	v6: http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/10/2

I have no objection to these patches, and as they are based on my
tty-next tree, should I be the ones accepting them?  If so, then I need
a bunch of acks from others involved in the kdb/kgdb code before I can
do so.

To make it easier, can I just take the tty driver patches now?  Will
that break anything?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/