lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50571045.9030304@metafoo.de>
Date:	Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:57:57 +0200
From:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To:	anish singh <anish198519851985@...il.com>
CC:	jic23@....ac.uk, cbou@...l.ru, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [V1]power: battery: Generic battery driver using IIO

On 09/17/2012 05:57 AM, anish singh wrote:
> Hello Lars,
> 
> Thanks for the review.All of you comments are valid but
> i just have a small question w.r.t one of your comments.
> Inline below.
> 
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de> wrote:
>> On 09/16/2012 09:14 AM, anish kumar wrote:
>>> From: anish kumar <anish198519851985@...il.com>
>>>
>>> In last version:
>>> Addressed concerns raised by lars:
>>> a. made the adc_bat per device.
>>> b. get the IIO channel using hardcoded channel names.
>>> c. Minor issues related to gpio_is_valid and some code
>>>    refactoring.
>>>
>>> In this version:
>>> Addressed concerns raised by Anton:
>>> a. changed the struct name to gab(generic adc battery).
>>> b. Added some functions to neaten the code.
>>> c. Some minor coding guidelines changes.
>>> d. Used the latest function introduce by lars:
>>>    iio_read_channel_processed to streamline the code.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: anish kumar <anish198519851985@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/power/generic-adc-battery.c       |  442 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  include/linux/power/generic-adc-battery.h |   19 ++
>>>  2 files changed, 461 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/power/generic-adc-battery.c
>>>  create mode 100644 include/linux/power/generic-adc-battery.h
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/power/generic-adc-battery.c b/drivers/power/generic-adc-battery.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..fd62916
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/power/generic-adc-battery.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,442 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * Generic battery driver code using IIO
>>> + * Copyright (C) 2012, Anish Kumar <anish198519851985@...il.com>
>>> + * based on jz4740-battery.c
>>> + * based on s3c_adc_battery.c
>>> + *
>>> + * This file is subject to the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public
>>> + * License.  See the file COPYING in the main directory of this archive for
>>> + * more details.
>>> + *
>>> + */
>>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>> +#include <linux/power_supply.h>
>>> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
>>> +#include <linux/err.h>
>>> +#include <linux/timer.h>
>>> +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
>>> +#include <linux/errno.h>
>>> +#include <linux/init.h>
>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>>> +#include <linux/iio/consumer.h>
>>> +#include <linux/iio/types.h>
>>> +#include <linux/power/generic-adc-battery.h>
>>> +
>>> +enum gab_chan_type {
>>> +     VOLTAGE = 0,
>>> +     CURRENT,
>>> +     POWER,
>>> +     MAX_CHAN_TYPE
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * gab_chan_name suggests the standard channel names for commonly used
>>> + * channel types.
>>> + */
>>> +static char *gab_chan_name[] = {
>>
>> const char *const
>>
>>> +     [VOLTAGE]       = "voltage",
>>> +     [CURRENT]       = "current",
>>> +     [POWER]         = "power",
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +struct gab {
>>> +     struct power_supply     psy;
>>> +     struct iio_channel      **channel;
>>> +     struct gab_platform_data        *pdata;
>>> +     struct delayed_work bat_work;
>>> +     int             was_plugged;
>>> +     int             volt_value;
>>> +     int             cur_value;
>>
>> The two above are never really used.
>>
>>> +     int             level;
>>> +     int             status;
>>> +     int             cable_plugged:1;
>>> +};
>> [...]
>>> +static enum power_supply_property gab_props[] = {
>> const
>>> +     POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_STATUS,
>>> +     POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_FULL_DESIGN,
>>> +     POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_EMPTY_DESIGN,
>>> +     POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_NOW,
>>> +     POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_NOW,
>>> +     POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_NOW,
>>> +     POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TECHNOLOGY,
>>> +     POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_MIN_DESIGN,
>>> +     POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_MAX_DESIGN,
>>> +     POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_MODEL_NAME,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * This properties are set based on the received platform data and this
>>> + * should correspond one-to-one with enum chan_type.
>>> + */
>>> +static enum power_supply_property gab_dyn_props[] = {
>> const
>>> +     POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_NOW,
>>> +     POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_NOW,
>>> +     POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_POWER_NOW,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static bool charge_finished(struct gab *adc_bat)
>>
>> missing prefix
>>
>>> +{
>>> +     bool ret = gpio_get_value(adc_bat->pdata->gpio_charge_finished);
>>> +     bool inv = adc_bat->pdata->gpio_inverted;
>>> +
>>> +     return ret ^ inv;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int gab_get_status(struct gab *adc_bat)
>> static
>>> +{
>>> +     struct gab_platform_data *pdata = adc_bat->pdata;
>>> +     int chg_gpio = pdata->gpio_charge_finished;
>>> +
>>> +     if (!gpio_is_valid(chg_gpio) || adc_bat->level < 100000)
>>
>> level is never really set, is it? Also the 100000 seems to come directly from
>> the s3c_adc_battery driver, while this value may be different for every
>> battery. I'd use the bat_info->charge_full_design here. Also I'd remove the
>> !gpio_is_valid(chg_gpio)  I don't see a reason why the battery could not be
>> fully charged even though no charger gpio is given.
> gpio_is_valid is just a call to check if the particular gpio is valid or not[1].
> I don't seem to understand why we are using it everywhere when only in probe it
> makes sense as far as my understanding goes.If in probe it is proper then why
> this check again and again(?) or is it possible that someone else
> does something somewhere which necessitates this gpio_is_valid check.
> 
> And we are using charger gpio in the probe function.
> 

Well, the charger gpio is optional. The behavior of the driver needs to be
different at some points whether a gpio is provided or not. E.g. if it is
not provided we do not know whether the device is currently being charged or
not.

- Lars

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ