[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120917141636.67e4b924@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:16:36 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [static analysis] memory corruption in tty/synclink.c on 64bit
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:18:19 +0300
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> I don't think anyone really cares about this but just for laughs here
> is the warning:
>
> drivers/tty/synclink.c:5418 usc_process_rxoverrun_sync() warn: potential memory corrupting cast 8 vs 2 bytes
> drivers/tty/synclink.c:6414 mgsl_reset_tx_dma_buffers() warn: potential memory corrupting cast 8 vs 2 bytes
> drivers/tty/synclink.c:6455 mgsl_reset_rx_dma_buffers() warn: potential memory corrupting cast 8 vs 2 bytes
> drivers/tty/synclink.c:6500 mgsl_free_rx_frame_buffers() warn: potential memory corrupting cast 8 vs 2 bytes
>
> 6489 /* reset current buffer for reuse */
> 6490 // pBufEntry->status = 0;
> 6491 // pBufEntry->count = DMABUFFERSIZE;
> 6492 *((unsigned long *)&(pBufEntry->count)) = DMABUFFERSIZE;
>
> It looks like the commented out code is the correct code and the code
> on line 6492 is the "faster" version? My static checker complains that
> it would corrupt the next struct elements on 64 bit. Also it only works
> on little endian systems.
>
> typedef struct _DMABUFFERENTRY
> {
> u32 phys_addr; /* 32-bit flat physical address of data buffer */
> volatile u16 count; /* buffer size/data count */
> volatile u16 status; /* Control/status field */
> volatile u16 rcc; /* character count field */
> u16 reserved; /* padding required by 16C32 */
>
> This was there in the original code when it was merged in 2.2.5pre1.
Should probably be changed to *((u32 *) at least. As it happens as far as
I can see its harmless however.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists