[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120917132102.GD28505@cathedrallabs.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:21:02 -0400
From: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...vo.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] cgroup TODOs
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 09:19:17AM +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 14:36 -0400, Aristeu Rozanski wrote:
> > also, heard about the desire of having a device namespace instead with
> > support for translation ("sda" -> "sdf"). If anyone see immediate use for
> > this please let me know.
>
> That sounds like a really bad idea to me. We've spent ages training
> users that the actual sd<x> name of their device doesn't matter and they
> should use UUIDs or WWNs instead ... why should they now care inside
> containers?
True, bad example on my part. The use case I had in mind when I wrote that
can be solved by symbolic links.
--
Aristeu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists