[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50573934.4030102@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:52:36 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Youquan Song <youquan.song@...el.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, lenb@...nel.org,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Youquan Song <youquan.song@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] x86,idle: Enhance cpuidle prediction to handle
its failure
On 09/18/2012 03:53 AM, Youquan Song wrote:
> The prediction for future is difficult and when the cpuidle governor prediction
> fails and govenor possibly choose the shallower C-state than it should. How to
> quickly notice and find the failure becomes important for power saving.
>
> cpuidle menu governor has a method to predict the repeat pattern if there are 8
> C-states residency which are continuous and the same or very close, so it will
> predict the next C-states residency will keep same residency time.
>
> This patchset adds a timer when menu governor choose a non-deepest C-state in
> order to wake up quickly from shallow C-state to avoid staying too long at
> shallow C-state for prediction failure. The timer is set to a time out value
> that is greater than predicted time and if the timer with the value is triggered
> , we can confidently conclude prediction is failure. When prediction
> succeeds, CPU is waken up from C-states in predicted time and the timer is not
> triggered and will be cancelled right after CPU waken up. When prediction fails,
> the timer is triggered to wake up CPU from shallow C-states, so menu governor
> will quickly notice that prediction fails and then re-evaluates deeper C-states
> possibility. This patchset can improves cpuidle prediction process for both
> repeat mode and general mode.
>
> There are 2 cases will clear show this patchset benefit.
>
> One case is turbostat utility (tools/power/x86/turbostat) at kernel 3.3 or early
> . turbostat utility will read 10 registers one by one at Sandybridge, so it will
> generate 10 IPIs to wake up idle CPUs. So cpuidle menu governor will predict it
> is repeat mode and there is another IPI wake up idle CPU soon, so it keeps idle
> CPU stay at C1 state even though CPU is totally idle. However, in the turbostat
> , following 10 registers reading is sleep 5 seconds by default, so the idle CPU
> will keep at C1 for a long time though it is idle until break event occurs.
> In a idle Sandybridge system, run "./turbostat -v", we will notice that deep
> C-state dangles between "70% ~ 99%". After patched the kernel, we will notice
> deep C-state stays at >99.98%.
Is there an impact on performances ?
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists