[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5057412B.6040402@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 23:26:35 +0800
From: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ACPI/pci-bind: remove bind/unbind callbacks from acpi_device_ops
On 09/17/2012 02:02 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com> wrote:
>>> @@ -160,10 +160,13 @@ static int acpi_bind_one(struct device *dev, acpi_handle handle)
>>> }
>>> dev->archdata.acpi_handle = handle;
>>>
>>> - acpi_pci_bind_notify(dev->archdata.acpi_handle, dev, true);
>>> -
>>> status = acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev);
>>> - if (!ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>>> + if (!ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>>> + acpi_dev = NULL;
>>> +
>>> + acpi_pci_bind_notify(dev->archdata.acpi_handle, acpi_dev, dev, true);
>>
>> It seems you can do
>> acpi_pci_bind_notify(acpi_dev, dev, true);
>> instead.
>>
>> aka:
>> Do you have test case acpi_dev is not created before pci device?
>>
>
> updated your patch, and retrieve handle if needed from acpi_dev->handle or
> pci_dev->dev.archdata.acpi_handle.
Hi Yinghai,
Thanks for your review. I have made some changes to the attached patch
to better support bisect. But the final result should be the same.
--Gerry
>
> Thanks
>
> Yinghai
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists