[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120917184954.GA349@polaris.bitmath.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:49:54 +0200
From: "Henrik Rydberg" <rydberg@...omail.se>
To: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@...il.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, lm-sensors@...sensors.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, khali@...ux-fr.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] applesmc: Bump max wait and rearrange udelay
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 02:06:05PM -0400, Parag Warudkar wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>
> > The current patch does exactly the same sleeps, the only difference is
> > that the test is also done before the first sleep. Thus, the increased
> > delay, if any, comes from the sleep range.
> My understanding is that the original patch resulted in trying a
> max udelay(16). The new one does usleep_range(16, 32). That's a minimum 16
> max 32 - so the fact that it stops read failures means the added delay is
> present and does help.
So the question is, does this patch work equally well for you?
Henrik
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c
index 2827088..8bf9011 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
/* wait up to 32 ms for a status change. */
#define APPLESMC_MIN_WAIT 0x0010
#define APPLESMC_RETRY_WAIT 0x0100
-#define APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT 0x8000
+#define APPLESMC_MAX_WAIT 0x10000
#define APPLESMC_READ_CMD 0x10
#define APPLESMC_WRITE_CMD 0x11
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists