[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120917194016.GI18677@google.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:40:16 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Colin Cross <ccross@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Walls <awalls@...metrocast.net>,
ivtv-devel@...vdriver.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] kthread_worker: reimplement flush_kthread_work() to
allow freeing during execution
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 03:50:40PM -0700, Colin Cross wrote:
> This patch set fixes a reproducible crash I'm seeing on a 3.4.10
> kernel. flush_kthread_worker (which is different from
> flush_kthread_work) is initializing a kthread_work and a completion on
> the stack, then queuing it and calling wait_for_completion. Once the
> completion is signaled, flush_kthread_worker exits and the stack
> region used by the kthread_work may be immediately reused by another
> object on the stack, but kthread_worker_fn continues accessing its
> work pointer:
> work->func(work); <- calls complete,
> effectively frees work
> smp_wmb(); /* wmb worker-b0 paired with flush-b1 */
> work->done_seq = work->queue_seq; <- overwrites a
> new stack object
> smp_mb(); /* mb worker-b1 paired with flush-b0 */
> if (atomic_read(&work->flushing))
> wake_up_all(&work->done); <- or crashes here
>
> These patches fix the problem by not accessing work after work->func
> is called, and should be backported to stable. They apply cleanly to
> 3.4.10. Upstream commits are 9a2e03d8ed518a61154f18d83d6466628e519f94
> and 46f3d976213452350f9d10b0c2780c2681f7075b.
Yeah, you're right. I wonder why this didn't come up before. Greg,
can you please pick up these two commits?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists