[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120917220356.GA9287@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:03:56 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
Cc: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@...il.com>, lm-sensors@...sensors.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, khali@...ux-fr.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] applesmc: Bump max wait and rearrange udelay
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:14:36PM +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> > Any better/other ideas ? Is the problem that we have to increase the wait time,
> > or is something else going on ?
>
> No, it makes sense now that I got the right number of zeroes. ;-)
>
> So, to be explicit, this is the patch I would like to go in. It is
> completely safe, back-portable, and a no-brainer. Parag, are you ok
> with being the author on this one?
>
> Thanks,
> Henrik
>
> From 868fc42edcb3a338ce0a0334e2dc50b01a7f6844 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@...il.com>
> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:49:55 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] applesmc: Bump max wait
>
> A heavy-load test on a MacBookPro6,1 is still showing a substantial
> amount of read errors. Increasing the maximum wait time to 128 ms
> resolves the issue.
>
> maybe-Signed-off-by: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
Applied after s/maybe-//.
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists