[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120918073741.GN13568@linux-sh.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:37:41 +0900
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/24] sh: use __iomem pointers for MMIO
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:34:47PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions,
> so we need to use the correct types everywhere.
>
> I'm not completely sure about this patch, and it will
> probably require some arch/sh changes to go along with it,
> but it's clear that something has to be done to avoid
> getting hundreds of new warnings on each shmobile build
> in v3.7.
> Please see this as a prototype.
>
I have no intention of making this change for arch/sh.
The __raw variants already accept both __iomem pointers and integer
addresses, which was largely intentional. New code could use the __iomem
annotations while older code could continue to use the integer addresses
without issue. If you wish to go through the kernel and audit every
single __raw user, you're certainly welcome to, but until then such a
change is premature.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists