linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: Make the managed clk functions generically available

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120918080037.GA15982@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de>
Date:	Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:00:37 +0200
From:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>, dedekind1@...il.com,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
	linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Make the managed clk functions generically available

On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:31:52PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:43:07PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> > I wouldn't mind having this merged sooner rather than later, there is at least
> > one driver in next which is currently broken due to the missing devm_clk_get.
> > Russell what's your plan for the patch? Maybe under the given circumstances it
> > makes sense to let it go through the m68k tree.
> 
> Ok, I've merged it but there was no indication in the patch that it was
> supposed to be a fix... there's no cc: to stable.  Does it need to go to
> stable?  When was this brokenness introduced?  What's the story for the
> m68k bit?

What tree is this supposed to go through? I've checked your ARM tree as
well as Mike's clock tree but neither seem to carry this patch. The
reason I ask is because I want to take a patch series that converts the
Unicore32 PWM code to the PWM framework into linux-next but it depends
on this patch as well.

Thierry

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped