linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 22/24] scsi: eesox: use _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201209180809.58542.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Tue, 18 Sep 2012 08:09:58 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/24] scsi: eesox: use __iomem pointers for MMIO

On Monday 17 September 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> In both of my replies, I've said "as x86 does".  We need to follow
> x86's behaviour here, which is as I've quoted - it's not a matter
> that "I need to make up my mind" - my mind is already well made up.
> That is, we need to follow x86 here.
> 
> That is, const volatile void __iomem * for reads, and volatile void
> __iomem * for writes.

Ok, I'll keep the patch in the series then, as it only changes the
pointer that we do an MMIO write on, not the ones for MMIO read.

	Arnd

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/