[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201209181313.30880.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:13:30 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
Cc: broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, lee.jones@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, aletes.xgr@...il.com,
kevin.wells@....com, srinivas.bakki@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi/pl022: Devicetree support w/o platform data
On Tuesday 18 September 2012, Roland Stigge wrote:
> --- linux-2.6.orig/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi_pl022.txt
> +++ linux-2.6/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi_pl022.txt
> @@ -10,6 +10,15 @@ Optional properties:
> - cs-gpios : should specify GPIOs used for chipselects.
> The gpios will be referred to as reg = <index> in the SPI child nodes.
> If unspecified, a single SPI device without a chip select can be used.
> +- pl022,bus-id : Bus ID (0, 1, ...)
I don't understand why we need the bus-id here. My understanding is that
this is a linux-specific number that should not be necessary when all
devices are described in the device tree rather than through spi_board_info.
Can't you just set master->bus_num to -1 when using the DT for probing?
> +- pl022,enable-dma : enables DMA driven transfers (boolean)
Similar thing here: Can't you just set the enable_dma flag when
a dma channel is provided in the device tree and unset it otherwise?
It also seems a bit pointless to enable DMA mode when you don't provide
a way to specify the channel at the same time.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists