linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/24] ARM: shmobile: use _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201209181604.49562.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:04:49 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/24] ARM: shmobile: use __iomem pointers for MMIO

On Tuesday 18 September 2012, Simon Horman wrote:
> > I agree it's not nice to have to do this, but this is largely because
> > of shmobile doing things differently from all other ARM platforms, on
> > which the respective patches tend to clean up things and reduce the
> > number of type casts.
> > 
> > The only alternative I can see is for shmobile to introduce its own
> > mach/io.h file with the relaxed type checking, but that would only
> > defer the problem until the point where you want shmobile to be part
> > of the common multiplatform kernel binary.
> 
> If it is needed in the long term, then I'm happy with it going in now.
> Could you remove the portion that Paul objected to?

Yes, I already did that.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/