[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo7bix_4bayh2ha_yogwNiLACU7Bymd_H5ur1wxF-tmTNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 11:13:23 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: pci: Keep pci_common_init() around after init
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding@...onic-design.de> wrote:
> When using deferred driver probing, PCI host controller drivers may
> actually require this function after the init stage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> index 2b2f25e..7288093 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> @@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ static int pcibios_map_irq(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin)
> return irq;
> }
>
> -static void __init pcibios_init_hw(struct hw_pci *hw, struct list_head *head)
> +static void __devinit pcibios_init_hw(struct hw_pci *hw, struct list_head *head)
Shouldn't we just remove __init completely, since Greg KH is in the
process of removing __devinit?
> {
> struct pci_sys_data *sys = NULL;
> int ret;
> @@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ static void __init pcibios_init_hw(struct hw_pci *hw, struct list_head *head)
> }
> }
>
> -void __init pci_common_init(struct hw_pci *hw)
> +void __devinit pci_common_init(struct hw_pci *hw)
> {
> struct pci_sys_data *sys;
> LIST_HEAD(head);
> --
> 1.7.12
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists