[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120918181439.GB29360@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:14:39 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: pci: Keep pci_common_init() around after init
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:13:23AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Thierry Reding
> <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de> wrote:
> > When using deferred driver probing, PCI host controller drivers may
> > actually require this function after the init stage.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> > index 2b2f25e..7288093 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> > @@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ static int pcibios_map_irq(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin)
> > return irq;
> > }
> >
> > -static void __init pcibios_init_hw(struct hw_pci *hw, struct list_head *head)
> > +static void __devinit pcibios_init_hw(struct hw_pci *hw, struct list_head *head)
>
> Shouldn't we just remove __init completely, since Greg KH is in the
> process of removing __devinit?
Yes, we probably should. In fact I have a patch on top of this marked
work-in-progress that I forgot to squash into this. That patch includes
the removal of __devinit for pcibios_update_irq() that should be covered
by a different patch I sent a few days ago as well as pcibios_swizzle()
and pcibios_init_resources(). I'll squash it into this patch and will
resend.
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists