[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1347992519-6904-7-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 11:21:58 -0700
From: Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: "kgene.kim" <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Srinivas KANDAGATLA <srinivas.kandagatla@...com>,
Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] spi: s3c64xx: Tidy up SPI chip select handling
While it is possible to use a GPIO, it is useful to be able to use the
SPI peripheral's built-in chip select feature. This should be supported.
The current driver is broken in that it doesn't properly support
the cs_change property in the message. To fix this, the chip select
should be changed in one place (enable/disable_cs()) instead of using the
macro separately in a different place. Also we need to make sure that
the FIFOs are cleared even in the event of an empty transaction or
error.
(This adds a proposed new fdt binding for Samsung SPI)
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-samsung.txt | 7 ++++
arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/s3c64xx-spi.h | 6 ++-
drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 34 +++++++++++++------
3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-samsung.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-samsung.txt
index 59bfc4f..74d67e1 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-samsung.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-samsung.txt
@@ -60,6 +60,13 @@ SPI Controller specific data in SPI slave nodes:
- 2: 180 degree phase shift sampling.
- 3: 270 degree phase shift sampling.
+- The spi slave nodes may provide the following optional properties:
+
+ - samsung,spi-cs: (boolean property). If present, uses the SPI controller's
+ built-in chip select feature, rather than toggling GPIOs manually. The
+ correct chip select line must still be specified in cs-gpio, and in this
+ case should be assigned to the SPI controller.
+
Aliases:
- All the SPI controller nodes should be represented in the aliases node using
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/s3c64xx-spi.h b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/s3c64xx-spi.h
index ceba18d..7103f71 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/s3c64xx-spi.h
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/s3c64xx-spi.h
@@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ struct platform_device;
* struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo - ChipSelect description
* @fb_delay: Slave specific feedback delay.
* Refer to FB_CLK_SEL register definition in SPI chapter.
- * @line: Custom 'identity' of the CS line.
+ * @line: Custom 'identity' of the CS line (-1 to use SPI controller)
+ * @use_spi_cs: Use SPI's chip select toggle instead of GPIO
*
* This is per SPI-Slave Chipselect information.
* Allocate and initialize one in machine init code and make the
@@ -25,7 +26,8 @@ struct platform_device;
*/
struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo {
u8 fb_delay;
- unsigned line;
+ int line;
+ bool only_spi_cs;
};
/**
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
index ed12872..c34ef8f 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
@@ -414,14 +414,21 @@ static inline void enable_cs(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd,
if (sdd->tgl_spi != spi) { /* if last mssg on diff device */
/* Deselect the last toggled device */
cs = sdd->tgl_spi->controller_data;
- gpio_set_value(cs->line,
- spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
+ writel(S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SIG_INACT,
+ sdd->regs + S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SEL);
+ if (!cs->only_spi_cs) {
+ gpio_set_value(cs->line,
+ spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
+ }
}
sdd->tgl_spi = NULL;
}
+ /* Start the signals */
cs = spi->controller_data;
- gpio_set_value(cs->line, spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 1 : 0);
+ if (!cs->only_spi_cs)
+ gpio_set_value(cs->line, spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 1 : 0);
+ writel(0, sdd->regs + S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SEL);
}
static int wait_for_xfer(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd,
@@ -514,7 +521,10 @@ static inline void disable_cs(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd,
if (sdd->tgl_spi == spi)
sdd->tgl_spi = NULL;
- gpio_set_value(cs->line, spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
+ /* Quiese the signals */
+ writel(S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SIG_INACT, sdd->regs + S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SEL);
+ if (!cs->only_spi_cs)
+ gpio_set_value(cs->line, spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
}
static void s3c64xx_spi_config(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd)
@@ -746,17 +756,10 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master,
/* Slave Select */
enable_cs(sdd, spi);
- /* Start the signals */
- writel(0, sdd->regs + S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SEL);
-
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sdd->lock, flags);
status = wait_for_xfer(sdd, xfer, use_dma);
- /* Quiese the signals */
- writel(S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SIG_INACT,
- sdd->regs + S3C64XX_SPI_SLAVE_SEL);
-
if (status) {
dev_err(&spi->dev, "I/O Error: "
"rx-%d tx-%d res:rx-%c tx-%c len-%d\n",
@@ -801,6 +804,9 @@ out:
else
sdd->tgl_spi = spi;
+ /* Make sure empty transactions and error clean up the state */
+ flush_fifo(sdd);
+
if (have_dma)
s3c64xx_spi_unmap_mssg(sdd, msg);
out_nomap:
@@ -878,6 +884,12 @@ static struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo *s3c64xx_get_slave_ctrldata(
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
+ /*
+ * Rather than manually toggle GPIOs, we can use the SPI chip select
+ * feature.
+ */
+ cs->only_spi_cs = of_property_read_bool(data_np, "samsung,spi-cs");
+
of_property_read_u32(data_np, "samsung,spi-feedback-delay", &fb_delay);
cs->fb_delay = fb_delay;
return cs;
--
1.7.7.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists