[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3ehlzdr9d.fsf_-_@intrepid.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:12:46 +0200
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>, Imre Kaloz <kaloz@...nwrt.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08+09/24] ARM: ixp4xx: use __iomem pointers for MMIO
Actually, there are some minor problems here (both patches merged,
ixp4xx only):
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/cpu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/cpu.h
> @@ -37,7 +38,7 @@
>
> static inline u32 ixp4xx_read_feature_bits(void)
> {
> - u32 val = ~*IXP4XX_EXP_CFG2;
> + u32 val = ~__raw_readl(IXP4XX_EXP_CFG2);
>
This is all fine, but
> @@ -51,7 +52,7 @@ static inline u32 ixp4xx_read_feature_bits(void)
>
> static inline void ixp4xx_write_feature_bits(u32 value)
> {
> - *IXP4XX_EXP_CFG2 = ~value;
> + __raw_writel(~cpu_to_le32(value), IXP4XX_EXP_CFG2);
> }
The EXP_CFG2 register is already in host order, no need for
cpu_to_le32() as the replaced code clearly shows.
Can you merge both IXP4xx parts (in the two patches) and fix the above,
please? Thanks.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists