linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: Make the managed clk functions generically available

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120919065510.GA3213@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de>
Date:	Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:55:11 +0200
From:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>, dedekind1@...il.com,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
	linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Make the managed clk functions generically available

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:40:14PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:25:55PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:35:36AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:00:37AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:31:52PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:43:07PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> > > > > > I wouldn't mind having this merged sooner rather than later, there is at least
> > > > > > one driver in next which is currently broken due to the missing devm_clk_get.
> > > > > > Russell what's your plan for the patch? Maybe under the given circumstances it
> > > > > > makes sense to let it go through the m68k tree.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Ok, I've merged it but there was no indication in the patch that it was
> > > > > supposed to be a fix... there's no cc: to stable.  Does it need to go to
> > > > > stable?  When was this brokenness introduced?  What's the story for the
> > > > > m68k bit?
> 
> I said abouve "I've merged it" - that means, I've put it in my
> tree...
> 
> > > > What tree is this supposed to go through? I've checked your ARM tree as
> > > > well as Mike's clock tree but neither seem to carry this patch. The
> > > > reason I ask is because I want to take a patch series that converts the
> > > > Unicore32 PWM code to the PWM framework into linux-next but it depends
> > > > on this patch as well.
> > > 
> > > It /is/ in my tree (you'll notice that it is in linux-next.)  You're
> > > probably looking at my Linaro tree instead, which doesn't carry
> > > anything which isn't about to be sent to Linus.
> > 
> > I must be blind then. next-20120918 doesn't have it. And looking at your
> > tree here[0] doesn't show the commit either.
> 
> Hmm, it's possible I didn't push the tree out... well, I have done so
> now, so it should be visible from tonight onwards and should be in
> -next sometime during the next couple of days (it seems to take a
> couple of days between me pushing stuff out one evening to stuff
> appearing in -next because of the timezones and timing of sfr's pulls.)

Okay, I see it both in your tree and in linux-next now. Thanks!

Thierry

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped