[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50598C1D.4050206@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:10:53 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, gleb@...hat.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/2] kvm: Add resampling irqfds for level triggered
interrupts
On 09/19/2012 12:08 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> Whoa. Can't we put the resampler entry somewhere we don't need to
>> search for it? Like a kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry, that's indexed by
>> gsi already (kvm_irq_routing_table::rt_entries[gsi]).
>
> I'm not sure why would we bother optimizing this,
Not optimizing, simplifying.
> but if we do, I guess we could look for the irq notifier
> which is already indexed by gsi.
It's not, it's looked up in a list.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists