lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50599AE2.80601@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:13:54 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
CC:	hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	andreas.herrmann3@....com, bp@...64.org, robert.richter@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86, kvm: use kernel_fpu_begin/end() in kvm_load/put_guest_fpu()

On 08/25/2012 12:12 AM, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> kvm's guest fpu save/restore should be wrapped around
> kernel_fpu_begin/end(). This will avoid for example taking a DNA
> in kvm_load_guest_fpu() when it tries to load the fpu immediately
> after doing unlazy_fpu() on the host side.
> 
> More importantly this will prevent the host process fpu from being
> corrupted.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
> Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c |    3 ++-
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 42bce48..67e773c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -5969,7 +5969,7 @@ void kvm_load_guest_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	 */
>  	kvm_put_guest_xcr0(vcpu);
>  	vcpu->guest_fpu_loaded = 1;
> -	unlazy_fpu(current);
> +	kernel_fpu_begin();
>  	fpu_restore_checking(&vcpu->arch.guest_fpu);
>  	trace_kvm_fpu(1);

This breaks kvm, since it disables preemption.  What we want here is to
save the user fpu state if it was loaded, and do nothing if wasn't.
Don't know what's the new API for that.

>  }
> @@ -5983,6 +5983,7 @@ void kvm_put_guest_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  
>  	vcpu->guest_fpu_loaded = 0;
>  	fpu_save_init(&vcpu->arch.guest_fpu);
> +	kernel_fpu_end();
>  	++vcpu->stat.fpu_reload;
>  	kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_DEACTIVATE_FPU, vcpu);
>  	trace_kvm_fpu(0);
> 


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ