[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120919115412.GA24731@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:54:12 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
To: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mfd: twl: Move PWM driver to PWM framework
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 01:23:15PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:29:49AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This mini series replaces the twl_has_*() macros by the equivalent
> > standard IS_ENABLED() macro and moves the PWM driver to the PWM
> > framework.
> >
> > I'll take the second patch through the PWM tree but would like to have
> > some Acked-bys from people that know and have the hardware and can
> > verify that I haven't broken anything.
> >
> > Thierry
> >
> > Thierry Reding (2):
> > mfd: twl: Replace twl_has_*() macros by IS_ENABLED()
> > pwm: Move TWL6030 PWM driver to PWM framework
> Both patches applied now, thanks.
Thanks. Are these queued for linux-next and 3.7?
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists