[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120919131632.GS8912@reaktio.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:16:32 +0300
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@....fi>
To: Oliver Chick <oliver.chick@...rix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xen.org, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Persistent grant maps for xen blk drivers
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:51:27AM +0100, Oliver Chick wrote:
> This patch implements persistent grants for the xen-blk{front,back}
> mechanism. The effect of this change is to reduce the number of unmap
> operations performed, since they cause a (costly) TLB shootdown. This
> allows the I/O performance to scale better when a large number of VMs
> are performing I/O.
>
> Previously, the blkfront driver was supplied a bvec[] from the request
> queue. This was granted to dom0; dom0 performed the I/O and wrote
> directly into the grant-mapped memory and unmapped it; blkfront then
> removed foreign access for that grant. The cost of unmapping scales
> badly with the number of CPUs in Dom0. An experiment showed that when
> Dom0 has 24 VCPUs, and guests are performing parallel I/O to a
> ramdisk, the IPIs from performing unmap's is a bottleneck at 5 guests
> (at which point 650,000 IOPS are being performed in total). If more
> than 5 guests are used, the performance declines. By 10 guests, only
> 400,000 IOPS are being performed.
>
> This patch improves performance by only unmapping when the connection
> between blkfront and back is broken.
>
So how many IOPS can you get with this patch / persistent grants ?
-- Pasi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists