linux-kernel - Re: [patch] block: make struct block_device cacheline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:16:51 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
To:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
cc:	jaxboe@...ionio.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] block: make struct block_device cacheline_aligned



On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Jeff Moyer wrote:

> Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com> writes:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > When testing against a pcie ssd or a ramdisk, making the block device
> > structure cacheline_aligned provided a significant increase in
> > performance:
> 
> Self-NACK on this one.  This results in a ton of warnings:
> 
> include/linux/fs.h:727: warning: ???__section__??? attribute does not
> apply to types
> In file included from include/linux/debugfs.h:18,
>                  from kernel/trace/trace_probe.h:28,
>                  from kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c:23:
> include/linux/fs.h:727: warning: ???__section__??? attribute does not
> apply to types
> 
> And that leaves me with the task of figuring out if/why this actually
> helps.
> 
> Cheers,
> Jeff

Hi

Use ____cacheline_aligned instead of __cacheline_aligned

Mikulas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/