linux-kernel - [tip:x86/asm] x86: Use REP BSF unconditionally

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-e26a44a2d618a491d5c6a2a8aaf66ee03a94739f@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:05:58 -0700
From:	tip-bot for Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, jbeulich@...e.com,
	JBeulich@...e.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:x86/asm] x86: Use REP BSF unconditionally

Commit-ID:  e26a44a2d618a491d5c6a2a8aaf66ee03a94739f
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/e26a44a2d618a491d5c6a2a8aaf66ee03a94739f
Author:     Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:16:14 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:26:08 +0200

x86: Use REP BSF unconditionally

Make "REP BSF" unconditional, as per the suggestion of hpa
and Linus, this removes the insane BSF_PREFIX conditional
and simplifies the logic.

Suggested-by: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5058741E020000780009C014@nat28.tlf.novell.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h |   19 ++-----------------
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
index b2af664..6dfd019 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
@@ -347,19 +347,6 @@ static int test_bit(int nr, const volatile unsigned long *addr);
 	 ? constant_test_bit((nr), (addr))	\
 	 : variable_test_bit((nr), (addr)))
 
-#if (defined(CONFIG_X86_GENERIC) || defined(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU)) \
-    && !defined(CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE)
-/*
- * Since BSF and TZCNT have sufficiently similar semantics for the purposes
- * for which we use them here, BMI-capable hardware will decode the prefixed
- * variant as 'tzcnt ...' and may execute that faster than 'bsf ...', while
- * older hardware will ignore the REP prefix and decode it as 'bsf ...'.
- */
-# define BSF_PREFIX "rep;"
-#else
-# define BSF_PREFIX
-#endif
-
 /**
  * __ffs - find first set bit in word
  * @word: The word to search
@@ -368,7 +355,7 @@ static int test_bit(int nr, const volatile unsigned long *addr);
  */
 static inline unsigned long __ffs(unsigned long word)
 {
-	asm(BSF_PREFIX "bsf %1,%0"
+	asm("rep; bsf %1,%0"
 		: "=r" (word)
 		: "rm" (word));
 	return word;
@@ -382,14 +369,12 @@ static inline unsigned long __ffs(unsigned long word)
  */
 static inline unsigned long ffz(unsigned long word)
 {
-	asm(BSF_PREFIX "bsf %1,%0"
+	asm("rep; bsf %1,%0"
 		: "=r" (word)
 		: "r" (~word));
 	return word;
 }
 
-#undef BSF_PREFIX
-
 /*
  * __fls: find last set bit in word
  * @word: The word to search
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/