linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6][RFC] Rework vsyscall to avoid truncation/rounding issue in timekeeping core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <505A06BD.6000406@linaro.org>
Date:	Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:54:05 -0700
From:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
CC:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6][RFC] Rework vsyscall to avoid truncation/rounding
 issue in timekeeping core

On 09/19/2012 10:03 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 09:31:35AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
>> With powerpc, there is no arch specific kernel code involved, its
>> just a data structure the kernel exports that is accessible to
>> userland. The execution logic lives in userland libraries, or
>> sometimes application code itself.
> I took a brief look at arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S and
> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/gettimeofday.S, and I see what looks a lot
> like functions
Sorry, yes. My statement wasn't subtle enough (and I may be confusing my 
history).

You are right, there is arch specific code involved, but the data 
structure that is exported is considered part of the abi since some 
applications access it directly.

See the comments and structure in:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso_datapage.h


> $ find arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso* -name gettimeofday.S|xargs grep FUNCTION_BEGIN
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:V_FUNCTION_BEGIN(__kernel_gettimeofday)
> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:V_FUNCTION_BEGIN(__kernel_clock_gettime)
> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:V_FUNCTION_BEGIN(__kernel_clock_getres)
> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/gettimeofday.S:V_FUNCTION_BEGIN(__kernel_gettimeofday)
> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/gettimeofday.S:V_FUNCTION_BEGIN(__kernel_clock_gettime)
> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/gettimeofday.S:V_FUNCTION_BEGIN(__kernel_clock_getres)
> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso64/gettimeofday.S:V_FUNCTION_BEGIN(__do_get_tspec)
>
> and I wonder whether these could be done in C instead.

Possibly, but I suspect they're in asm for performance reasons.

Paul/Ben: Do you have any thoughts here?

thanks
-john

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/