| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:51:56 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix NR_ISOLATED_[ANON|FILE] mismatch
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:28:10PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 01:04:56PM -0400, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > When I looked at zone stat mismatch problem, I found
> > > migrate_to_node doesn't decrease NR_ISOLATED_[ANON|FILE]
> > > if check_range fails.
>
> This is a bit misleading. It's not that the stats would be
> inaccurate, it's that the pages would be leaked from the LRU, no?
>
> > > It can make system hang out.
>
> Did you spot this by code review only or did you actually run into
> this? Because...
>
> > > Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> > > Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
> > > Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > > mm/mempolicy.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > > index 3d64b36..6bf0860 100644
> > > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> > > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > > @@ -953,16 +953,16 @@ static int migrate_to_node(struct mm_struct *mm, int source, int dest,
> > >
> > > vma = check_range(mm, mm->mmap->vm_start, mm->task_size, &nmask,
> > > flags | MPOL_MF_DISCONTIG_OK, &pagelist);
> > > - if (IS_ERR(vma))
> > > - return PTR_ERR(vma);
> > > -
> > > - if (!list_empty(&pagelist)) {
> > > + if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
> > > + err = PTR_ERR(vma);
> > > + goto out;
> > > + }
> > > + if (!list_empty(&pagelist))
> > > err = migrate_pages(&pagelist, new_node_page, dest,
> > > false, MIGRATE_SYNC);
> > > - if (err)
> > > - putback_lru_pages(&pagelist);
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > +out:
> > > + if (err)
> > > + putback_lru_pages(&pagelist);
> >
> > Good catch!
> > This is a regression since following commit. So, I doubt we need
> > all or nothing semantics. Can we revert it instead? (and probably
> > we need more kind comment for preventing an accident)
>
> I think it makes sense to revert. Not because of the semantics, but I
> just don't see how check_range() could even fail for this callsite:
>
> 1. we pass mm->mmap->vm_start in there, so we should not fail due to
> find_vma()
>
> 2. we pass MPOL_MF_DISCONTIG_OK, so the discontig checks do not apply
> and so can not fail
>
> 3. we pass MPOL_MF_MOVE | MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL, the page table loops will
> continue until addr == end, so we never fail with -EIO
>
> > commit 0def08e3acc2c9c934e4671487029aed52202d42
> > Author: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@...il.com>
> > Date: Tue Oct 26 14:21:32 2010 -0700
> >
> > mm/mempolicy.c: check return code of check_range
>
> We don't use this code to "check" the range, we use it to collect
> migrate pages. There is no failure case.
>
Here it goes.
>From c2c21b551811e034eb0ede6806e0314b201d7e5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:39:52 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] mm: revert 0def08e3, mm/mempolicy.c: check return code of
check_range
This patch reverts 0def08e3 because check_range can't fail in
migrate_to_node with considering current usecases.
Quote from Johannes
"
I think it makes sense to revert. Not because of the semantics, but I
just don't see how check_range() could even fail for this callsite:
1. we pass mm->mmap->vm_start in there, so we should not fail due to
find_vma()
2. we pass MPOL_MF_DISCONTIG_OK, so the discontig checks do not apply
and so can not fail
3. we pass MPOL_MF_MOVE | MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL, the page table loops will
continue until addr == end, so we never fail with -EIO
"
And I add new VM_BUG_ON for checking migrate_to_node's future usecase
which might pass to MPOL_MF_STRICT.
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@...il.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 3d64b36..9ec87bd 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -946,15 +946,16 @@ static int migrate_to_node(struct mm_struct *mm, int source, int dest,
nodemask_t nmask;
LIST_HEAD(pagelist);
int err = 0;
- struct vm_area_struct *vma;
nodes_clear(nmask);
node_set(source, nmask);
- vma = check_range(mm, mm->mmap->vm_start, mm->task_size, &nmask,
+ /*
+ * Collect migrate pages and it shoudn't be failed.
+ */
+ VM_BUG_ON(flags & MPOL_MF_STRICT);
+ check_range(mm, mm->mmap->vm_start, mm->task_size, &nmask,
flags | MPOL_MF_DISCONTIG_OK, &pagelist);
- if (IS_ERR(vma))
- return PTR_ERR(vma);
if (!list_empty(&pagelist)) {
err = migrate_pages(&pagelist, new_node_page, dest,
--
1.7.9.5
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists