linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mfd: twl: Move PWM driver to PWM framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120919053924.GA611@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de>
Date:	Wed, 19 Sep 2012 07:39:24 +0200
From:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
To:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
	Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mfd: twl: Move PWM driver to PWM framework

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:59AM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
> 
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 02:10:18PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This mini series replaces the twl_has_*() macros by the equivalent
> > standard IS_ENABLED() macro and moves the PWM driver to the PWM
> > framework.
> > 
> > I'll take the second patch through the PWM tree but would like to have
> > some Acked-bys from people that know and have the hardware and can
> > verify that I haven't broken anything.
> We're already going to have conflicts for twl-core.c as Tony is pushing some
> code for it through his tree. So, would you be ok with me carrying the whole
> series through the MFD tree ?

Yes, that's okay with me.

Thierry

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped