linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH, v2] allow gpiolib to be a module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdYamf9SG-Ugx78kyuoVSzqELzLJ23XkqOi-UkgczNkPxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:49:03 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc:	Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, v2] allow gpiolib to be a module

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com> wrote:

> Without ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB there's no reason to force this code, when
> enabled, to always be built into the kernel, which requires only minor
> Makefile and source code adjustments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
> Cc: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>
>
> ---
> v2: Make gpiolib_init() static. Properly handle !CONFIG_DEBUG_FS case.

This is looking better to me indeed, but I definately want Grant's
consent before mergeing this, not just as primary GPIO maintainer,
but also since he's been looking a lot more into module dependencies
lately.

Ping on Grant...

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/