[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdakOF6gmckrn0apynGippb2Z-oa82eYtv6tBoKH8pKrYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:51:37 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/19] ARM: ux500: Add all known I2C sub-device nodes to
the HREF DT
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:34:15AM -0700, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Here we add the skeleton nodes for each of the known I2C sub-devices
>> > currently registered on ST-Ericsson's HREF Development Platform. We
>> > will fill these nodes in turn as the drivers are enabled for Device
>> > Tree.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>>
>> Can't we have it the other way around (discussing patch ordering
>> with Arnd simultaneously), so you first add the DT support to the
>> subdevices, then add the more complete nodes to the device tree?
>>
>> And if you put in a device tree like this, will these devices
>> not collide with the ones that are currently supplied from
>> the boardfiles? I'm a bit confused here, maybe I'm not smart
>> enough to understand this...
>
> Okay, I've reordered the patch-set to address these possible issues.
OK sorry for delay, I've been patch-swamped...
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists