linux-kernel - Re: lve module taint?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <877grppqkp.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:29:02 +0930
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
Cc:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	Alex Lyashkov <umka@...udlinux.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: lve module taint?

Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 09:58:09AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> On 19.09.2012 06:02, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> This is setting a, in my opinion, rather bad precedent.  Next we'll
>> be adding various modules here due to various reasons.

We have, that bridge has already been crossed.  I wasn't asking about
the patch itself.

My question was simply whether the lve module is still claiming to be
GPL without being compliant or not.

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/