[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fw6dxfnu.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 01:27:33 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] PCI/PM: Fix kexec for D3cold and bridge suspending
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> writes:
> On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 00:38 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> writes:
>>
>> > +cc Eric and kexec list
>> >
>> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:54 AM, Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
>> >> If PCI devices are put into D3cold before kexec, because the
>> >> configuration registers of PCI devices in D3cold are not accessible.
>> >>
>> >> And if PCI bridges are put into low power state before kexec,
>> >> configuration registers of PCI devices underneath the PCI bridges are
>> >> not accessible too.
>> >>
>> >> These will make some PCI devices can not be scanned after kexec, so
>> >> resume the PCI devices in D3cold or PCI bridges in low power state
>> >> before kexec.
>> >
>> > Don't we need to resume the device even without the kexec issue? And
>> > even if it's in D1 or D2?
>>
>> The basic requirement is that the device needs to be visible so we can
>> auto discover it. As I recall most sleep states don't make the device
>> invisible and we can handle the rest in the device initializatoin code.
>
> PCI devices in D3cold or under a bridge in D3hot will not be visible, so
> we must fix that for kexec to run properly.
That seems reasonable to me.
>> > It looks to me like pci_msi_shutdown() (and probably drv->shutdown())
>> > depend on the device being in D0.
>>
>> There is certainly a depenency on the config registers being visible.
>> Although I don't know if much will go wrong if they aren't.
>>
>> Ceratinly pci_msi_shutdown doesn't have anything to do if the device has
>> had so much power removed that the device is not even exectuing.
>
> Don't know which power state device should be in for pci_msi_shutdown
> etc. But it appears that normal shutdown/reboot and kexec works at most
> times so far. D3cold and bridge in D3hot works for normal
> shutdown/reboot, but not for kexec. So I write some fix.
To be clear. Has someone picked up this patch yet?
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
As for reboot it tends to always work because frequently the firmware
code triggers a soft reset of the entire machine, which puts devices in
their power on reset state, which is not a suspended state. Although
that behavior is not required for a software reboot.
Eric
> Best Regards,
> Huang Ying
>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
>> >> ---
>> >> drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 4 ++++
>> >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>> >>
>> >> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>> >> @@ -421,6 +421,10 @@ static void pci_device_shutdown(struct d
>> >> struct pci_dev *pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>> >> struct pci_driver *drv = pci_dev->driver;
>> >>
>> >> + /* Resume bridges and devices in D3cold for kexec to work properly */
>> >> + if (pci_dev->current_state == PCI_D3cold || pci_dev->subordinate)
>> >> + pm_runtime_resume(dev);
>> >> +
>> >> if (drv && drv->shutdown)
>> >> drv->shutdown(pci_dev);
>> >> pci_msi_shutdown(pci_dev);
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > kexec mailing list
>> > kexec@...ts.infradead.org
>> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists