[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaufGjsEtkjQFY9oDvmtM7xnEiFweLfOGuX+WRf0Vbb5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:07:37 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RCU lockup in the SMP idle thread, help...
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> In the meantime, a crude fallback is for the CPU that detected the stall
> to trace the stack of the task running on the other CPU. See below for
> a crude (and untested) patch.
OK now I get this:
INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 0} (detected by 1,
t=29508 jiffies)
Task dump for CPU 0:
swapper/0 R running 0 0 0 0x00000000
[<c02da614>] (__schedule+0x238/0x52c) from [<c000f238>] (default_idle+0x28/0x30)
[<c000f238>] (default_idle+0x28/0x30) from [<ffffffff>] (0xffffffff)
INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 0} (detected by 1,
t=29851 jiffies)
Task dump for CPU 0:
swapper/0 R running 0 0 0 0x00000000
[<c02da614>] (__schedule+0x238/0x52c) from [<c000f238>] (default_idle+0x28/0x30)
[<c000f238>] (default_idle+0x28/0x30) from [<ffffffff>] (0xffffffff)
So the swapper thread is the culprit?
Hm, I'm not very smart with this no...
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists