[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120920094017.GA4918@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:40:17 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86-ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, kprobes: Hide skip_singlestep forward declaration
properly
* Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com> wrote:
> (2012/09/20 18:25), Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com> wrote:
> >
> >> (2012/09/19 22:46), Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >>> From: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
> >>>
> >>> I get
> >>>
> >>> arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c:544:23: warning: ‘skip_singlestep’ declared ‘static’ but never defined [-Wunused-function]
> >>>
> >>> on tip/auto-latest.
> >>>
> >>> Hide the forward declaration in the KPROBES_CAN_USE_FTRACE as it
> >>> is done in its callsites.
> >>
> >> Thank you for reporting and fixing :)
> >
> > Why is a forward declation needed, why isn't the function in the
> > proper spot in the file to begin with?
>
> There is no reason, ftrace-related things can also be moved on top.
> Borislav, could you move it?
Could be moved into a separate file as well - we could have
arch/x86/kprobes/, with core.c, opt.c, ftrace.c and common.h in
it - possibly more in the future.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists