[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1348104303.4836.63.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 02:25:03 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Ed Cashin <ecashin@...aid.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<jesse@...ira.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] aoe: mark AoE packets as requiring no checksumming
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 18:17 -0700, Ed Cashin wrote:
> In order for the network layer to see that AoE requires
> no checksumming in a generic way, packets should be marked
> CHECKSUM_NONE.
Which they are by default.
> Rather than relying on the current behavior of alloc_skb,
> this change causes the aoe driver to explicitly mark its
> packets as requiring no checksum.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ed Cashin <ecashin@...aid.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c b/drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c
> index de0435e..0ba1b63 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ new_skb(ulong len)
> skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
> skb_reset_network_header(skb);
> skb->protocol = __constant_htons(ETH_P_AOE);
> + skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
Can be written as:
skb_checksum_none_assert(skb);
if you really want to be sure.
Ben.
> }
> return skb;
> }
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists