lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:28:55 +0530
From:	Ashish Chavan <ashish.chavan@...tcummins.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC:	lrg <lrg@...com>, alsa-devel <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
	David Dajun Chen <david.chen@...semi.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2] ASoC: codecs: Add DA9055 codec driver


> > +	/* DAC Routing control */
> > +	SOC_ENUM("DAC Left Select", da9055_dac_l_select),
> > +	SOC_ENUM("DAC Right Select", da9055_dac_r_select),
> 
> DAPM.  This even says its a routing control...

Yes, let me see if I can make it DAPM based.

> 
> > +	/* To select if MIC Bias powers MIC 1 or MIC 2 */
> > +	SOC_ENUM("Mic Bias Select", da9055_mic_bias_select),
> 
> This would normally be something controlled by the board...  what
> exactly is this doing?  How does the MICBIAS relate to the microphone
> inputs?

Yes, it should be controlled by the board.
This control selects which of the two MIC Bias pins acts as the BIAS
source. Earlier we misinterpreted it because of a hardware modification
which was present on the board without our knowledge.

> 
> > +	case SND_SOC_BIAS_STANDBY:
> > +		if (codec->dapm.bias_level == SND_SOC_BIAS_OFF) {
> > +			/* Enable VMID reference & master bias */
> > +			snd_soc_update_bits(codec, DA9055_REFERENCES,
> > +					    DA9055_VMID_EN | DA9055_BIAS_EN,
> > +					    DA9055_VMID_EN | DA9055_BIAS_EN);
> > +		}
> > +		regcache_sync(da9055->regmap);
> 
> Doing the sync every time is very odd, why is it only done on
> transitions from _OFF?

It was a typo :-( I intend to put the sync inside if().

> Given that there's no regulator support here
> it's also a bit surprising that you need to do a sync outside of system
> suspend...
> 

I am not sure if I understood this fully. Do you mean a sync is not
required here?


> > +	da9055->mclk_rate       = 0;    /* This will be set from set_sysclk() */
> > +	da9055->master          = 0;    /* This will be set from set_fmt() */
> 
> You use kzalloc...
> 

Yeah!


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ