[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1348105949-25454-4-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:52:06 -0700
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: [PATCH 04/27] audit: Use current instead of NETLINK_CREDS() in audit_filter
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Get caller process uid and gid and pid values from the current task
instead of the NETLINK_CB. This is simpler than passing NETLINK_CREDS
from from audit_receive_msg to audit_filter_user_rules and avoid the
chance of being hit by the occassional bugs in netlink uid/gid
credential passing. This is a safe changes because all netlink
requests are processed in the task of the sending process.
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
include/linux/audit.h | 2 +-
kernel/audit.c | 2 +-
kernel/auditfilter.c | 13 ++++++-------
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h
index 36abf2a..9c9af0e 100644
--- a/include/linux/audit.h
+++ b/include/linux/audit.h
@@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ extern void audit_log_secctx(struct audit_buffer *ab, u32 secid);
extern int audit_update_lsm_rules(void);
/* Private API (for audit.c only) */
-extern int audit_filter_user(struct netlink_skb_parms *cb);
+extern int audit_filter_user(void);
extern int audit_filter_type(int type);
extern int audit_receive_filter(int type, int pid, int uid, int seq,
void *data, size_t datasz, uid_t loginuid,
diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
index 7b7268e..fecb150 100644
--- a/kernel/audit.c
+++ b/kernel/audit.c
@@ -744,7 +744,7 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
if (!audit_enabled && msg_type != AUDIT_USER_AVC)
return 0;
- err = audit_filter_user(&NETLINK_CB(skb));
+ err = audit_filter_user();
if (err == 1) {
err = 0;
if (msg_type == AUDIT_USER_TTY) {
diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
index a6c3f1a..b754f43 100644
--- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
+++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
@@ -1236,8 +1236,7 @@ int audit_compare_dname_path(const char *dname, const char *path,
return strncmp(p, dname, dlen);
}
-static int audit_filter_user_rules(struct netlink_skb_parms *cb,
- struct audit_krule *rule,
+static int audit_filter_user_rules(struct audit_krule *rule,
enum audit_state *state)
{
int i;
@@ -1249,13 +1248,13 @@ static int audit_filter_user_rules(struct netlink_skb_parms *cb,
switch (f->type) {
case AUDIT_PID:
- result = audit_comparator(cb->creds.pid, f->op, f->val);
+ result = audit_comparator(task_pid_vnr(current), f->op, f->val);
break;
case AUDIT_UID:
- result = audit_comparator(cb->creds.uid, f->op, f->val);
+ result = audit_comparator(current_uid(), f->op, f->val);
break;
case AUDIT_GID:
- result = audit_comparator(cb->creds.gid, f->op, f->val);
+ result = audit_comparator(current_gid(), f->op, f->val);
break;
case AUDIT_LOGINUID:
result = audit_comparator(audit_get_loginuid(current),
@@ -1287,7 +1286,7 @@ static int audit_filter_user_rules(struct netlink_skb_parms *cb,
return 1;
}
-int audit_filter_user(struct netlink_skb_parms *cb)
+int audit_filter_user(void)
{
enum audit_state state = AUDIT_DISABLED;
struct audit_entry *e;
@@ -1295,7 +1294,7 @@ int audit_filter_user(struct netlink_skb_parms *cb)
rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(e, &audit_filter_list[AUDIT_FILTER_USER], list) {
- if (audit_filter_user_rules(cb, &e->rule, &state)) {
+ if (audit_filter_user_rules(&e->rule, &state)) {
if (state == AUDIT_DISABLED)
ret = 0;
break;
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists