[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120920.174827.1245530945282009606.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:48:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] net: use a per task frag allocator
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:56:01 +0200
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> We currently use a per socket page reserve for tcp_sendmsg() operations.
>
> This page is used to build fragments for skbs.
>
> Its done to increase probability of coalescing small write() into
> single segments in skbs still in write queue (not yet sent)
>
> But it wastes a lot of memory for applications handling many mostly
> idle sockets, since each socket holds one page in sk->sk_sndmsg_page
>
> Its also quite inefficient to build TSO packets of 64KB, because we need
> about 16 pages per skb on arches where PAGE_SIZE = 4096, so we hit
> page allocator more than wanted.
>
> This patch switches this frag allocator from socket to task structure,
> and uses bigger pages.
>
> (up to 32768 bytes per frag, thats order-3 pages on x86)
>
> This increases TCP stream performance by 20% on loopback device,
> but also benefits on other network devices, since 8x less frags are
> mapped on transmit and unmapped on tx completion.
>
> Its possible some TSO enabled hardware cant cope with bigger fragments,
> but their ndo_start_xmit() should already handle this, splitting a
> fragment in sub fragments, since some arches have PAGE_SIZE=65536
>
> Successfully tested on various ethernet devices.
> (ixgbe, igb, bnx2x, tg3, mellanox mlx4)
>
> Followup patches can use this infrastructure in two other spots
> and get rid of the socket sk_sndmsg_page.
>
> Open for discussion : Should we fallback to smaller pages
> if order-3 page allocations fail ?
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
I like this a lot and I look forward to your upcoming changes to
convert the other two sk_sndmsg_page users as well, but I can't
apply this to net-next just yet.
The question on fallback is a good one and something we have
to resolve before applying this.
Note in particular that sk_allocation can be set to just about
anything, and this also has potential interaction issues with
SOCK_MEMALLOC.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists