[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <505BF83D.8040201@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 23:16:45 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: "Philip, Avinash" <avinashphilip@...com>
CC: grant.likely@...retlab.ca, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
rob@...dley.net, rpurdie@...ys.net,
thierry.reding@...onic-design.de,
broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, shawn.guo@...aro.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nsekhar@...com,
gururaja.hebbar@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pwm_backlight: Add device tree support for Low Threshold
Brightness
On 09/20/2012 10:51 PM, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> Some backlights perform poorly when driven by a PWM with a short
> duty-cycle. For such devices, the low threshold can be used to specify a
> lower bound for the duty-cycle and should be chosen to exclude the
> problematic range.
>
> This patch adds support for an optional low-threshold-brightness
> property.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/backlight/pwm-backlight.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/backlight/pwm-backlight.txt
> Optional properties:
> - pwm-names: a list of names for the PWM devices specified in the
> "pwms" property (see PWM binding[0])
> + - low-threshold-brightness: brightness threshold low level. Low threshold
> + brightness set to value so that backlight present on low end of
> + brightness.
For my education, why not just specify values above this value in the
brightness-levels array; how do those two interact? It seems like any
description of that is missing from the PWM documentation, and would be
good to have in the DT binding too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists