[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1BB550D9-A61C-4B9A-B4C8-0DB22C367C98@antoniou-consulting.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:34:09 +0300
From: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matt Porter <mporter@...com>,
Koen Kooi <koen@...inion.thruhere.net>,
Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@...com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] OMAP i2c: pinctrl-ify i2c-omap.c
On Sep 21, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 09/19/2012 07:07 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Add support for pinctrl mux settings in the OMAP I2C driver.
>> If no such pinctl bindings are found a warning message is printed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
>> index b149e32..f722478 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
>> @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> #include <linux/i2c-omap.h>
>> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>> +#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
>> +#include <linux/err.h>
>>
>> /* I2C controller revisions */
>> #define OMAP_I2C_OMAP1_REV_2 0x20
>> @@ -1057,6 +1059,7 @@ omap_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> const struct of_device_id *match;
>> int irq;
>> int r;
>> + struct pinctrl *pinctrl;
>>
>> /* NOTE: driver uses the static register mapping */
>> mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> @@ -1197,6 +1200,10 @@ omap_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> of_i2c_register_devices(adap);
>>
>> + pinctrl = devm_pinctrl_get_select_default(&pdev->dev);
>> + if (IS_ERR(pinctrl))
>> + dev_warn(dev->dev, "pins are not configured from the driver\n");
>
> Can you use &pdev->dev for the dev_warn() here?
> the dev->dev is quite confusing especially since you used &pdev->dev for the
> pinctrl call.
Not really, since this is the device argument used in all dev_* calls in the function.
A few lines before you have:
> dev_err(dev->dev, "failure adding adapter\n");
And so on.
Using a different device argument there would be confusing.
>
>> +
>> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev->dev);
>> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev->dev);
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Péter
Regards
-- Pantelis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists