linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] PCI/IOV: simplify code by hotplug safe pci_get_domain_bus_and

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <505C7687.1030001@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:15:35 -0400
From:	Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
	Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] PCI/IOV: simplify code by hotplug safe pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot()

On 09/21/2012 02:22 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Bjorn Helgaas<bhelgaas@...gle.com>  wrote:
>> This is another thing I'm curious about.  How do you handle this
>> situation today (before host bridge hot-add)?
>>
>> The DMAR I'm not so worried about because as far as I know, there's no
>> such thing as a DMAR that's discovered by PCI enumeration.  We should
>> discover it via ACPI, and that can happen before we enumerate anything
>> behind a host bridge, so I don't really see any ordering problem
>> between the DMAR and the PCI devices that would use it.
>
> only need to have pci devices on that root bus scanned, and current intel iommu
> maintain one device scope to drhd with pointer to pci device... that
> need to be fixed
> too.
>
translation: you have an ACPI-DMAR setup bug?  a drhd can have multiple device
scopes, one of which can be "all devices under bus X uses this IOMMU".
If (dynamic) DMARs are scanned at root hot-plug time in ACPI hot-plug,
the proper dmar-init should be completed before any PCI devs are scanned
(and put into the proper iommu domain).

>>
>> However, I know there *are* IOAPICs that are enumerated as PCI
>> devices, and I don't know whether we can deduce a relationship between
>> the IOAPIC and the devices that use it.  Don't we have this problem
>> already?  I assume that even without hot-adding a host bridge, we
>> might discover a PCI IOAPIC that was present at boot, and we'd have to
>> make sure to bind a driver to it before we use any of the PCI devices
>> connected to it.  How does that work?
>
> I converted it to acpi way to discover it, and it could handle that case.
>
> will search _GSB and try to get pci device, if there is pci device
> will try to get BAR as ioapic base.
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/yinghai/linux-yinghai.git;a=blob;f=drivers/pci/ioapic.c;h=504ca93ac692646a7754fff83a04e3d07d98f648;hb=refs/heads/for-x86-irq
>
> something like:
>
> static void handle_ioapic_add(acpi_handle handle, struct pci_dev **pdev,
> 				 u32 *pgsi_base)
> {
> 	acpi_status status;
> 	unsigned long long gsb;
> 	struct pci_dev *dev;
> 	u32 gsi_base;
> 	int ret;
> 	char *type;
> 	struct resource r;
> 	struct resource *res =&r;
> 	char objname[64];
> 	struct acpi_buffer buffer = {sizeof(objname), objname};
>
> 	*pdev = NULL;
> 	*pgsi_base = 0;
>
> 	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_GSB", NULL,&gsb);
> 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || !gsb)
> 		return;
>
> 	dev = acpi_get_pci_dev(handle);
> 	if (!dev) {
> 		struct acpi_device_info *info;
> 		char *hid = NULL;
>
> 		status = acpi_get_object_info(handle,&info);
> 		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> 			return;
> 		if (info->valid&  ACPI_VALID_HID)
> 			hid = info->hardware_id.string;
> 		if (!hid || strcmp(hid, "ACPI0009")) {
> 			kfree(info);
> 			return;
> 		}
> 		kfree(info);
> 		memset(res, 0, sizeof(*res));
> 		acpi_walk_resources(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS, setup_res, res);
> 		if (!res->flags)
> 			return;
> 	}
>
> 	acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME,&buffer);
>
> 	gsi_base = gsb;
> 	type = "IOxAPIC";
> 	if (dev) {
> 		ret = pci_enable_device(dev);
> 		if (ret<  0)
> 			goto exit_put;
>
> 		pci_set_master(dev);
>
> 		if (dev->class == PCI_CLASS_SYSTEM_PIC_IOAPIC)
> 			type = "IOAPIC";
>
> 		if (pci_request_region(dev, 0, type))
> 			goto exit_disable;
>
> 		res =&dev->resource[0];
> 	}
>
> 	if (acpi_register_ioapic(handle, res->start, gsi_base)) {
> 		if (dev)
> 			goto exit_release;
> 		return;
> 	}
>
> 	printk(KERN_INFO "%s %s %s at %pR, GSI %u\n",
> 		dev ? dev_name(&dev->dev) : "", objname, type,
> 		res, gsi_base);
>
> 	*pdev = dev;
> 	*pgsi_base = gsi_base;
> 	return;
>
> exit_release:
> 	pci_release_region(dev, 0);
> exit_disable:
> 	pci_disable_device(dev);
> exit_put:
> 	pci_dev_put(dev);
> }

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/