[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120921003523.GX7264@google.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:35:23 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, neilb@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 20/26] block: Add bio_for_each_segment_all()
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 05:22:31PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> This is part of the immutable bvec prep work; bio_for_each_segment() is
> going to have a different implementation so these need to be split
> apart.
>
> This change is also to better document the intent of code that's using
> it - bio_for_each_segment_all() is only legal to use for code that owns
> the bio.
How about something like following?
__bio_for_each_segment() iterates bvecs from the specified index
instead of bio->bv_idx. Currently, the only usage is to walk all the
bvecs after the bio has been advanced by specifying 0 index.
To help immutable bvec implementation, replace it with
bio_for_each_segment_all() which also better documents the intent of
code that's using it. Note that bio_for_each_segment_all() should
only be used by the code which owns the bio.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists