[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120921171840.GB10409@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 20:18:41 +0300
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: "S, Venkatraman" <svenkatr@...com>
Cc: Matt Porter <mporter@...com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
Linux DaVinci Kernel List
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linux Documentation List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Devicetree Discuss <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Dan Williams <djbw@...com>,
Linux SPI Devel List
<spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Linux OMAP List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/13] mmc: omap_hsmmc: limit max_segs with the EDMA
DMAC
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:47:30PM +0530, S, Venkatraman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:45 PM, S, Venkatraman <svenkatr@...com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Matt Porter <mporter@...com> wrote:
> >> The EDMA DMAC has a hardware limitation that prevents supporting
> >> scatter gather lists with any number of segments. Since the EDMA
> >> DMA Engine driver sets the maximum segments to 16, we do the
> >> same.
> >>
> >> Note: this can be removed once the DMA Engine API supports an
> >> API to query the DMAC's segment limitations.
> >>
> >
> > I wouldn't want to bind the properties of EDMA to omap_hsmmc as this patch
> > suggests. Why don't we have a max_segs property, which when explicitly specified
> > in DT, will override the default ?
>
> If you are adventurous, this can be a generic mmc DT binding instead
> of restricting it to OMAP.
I say if it's a limitation in the DMAC, then DMAC's driver should handle
it, no ? Meaning that in this case you would copy from one multi-segment
sg into a one-segment sg and when transfer is complete, before calling
user's callback, copy data the other way around (?)
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists