[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120921173352.GE7264@google.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:33:52 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, devel@...nvz.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/16] slab: Ignore the cflgs bit in cache creation
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 06:11:57PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> No cache should ever pass that as a creation flag, since this bit is
> used to mark an internal decision of the slab about object placement. We
> can just ignore this bit if it happens to be passed (such as when
> duplicating a cache in the kmem memcg patches)
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> CC: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
> CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> ---
> mm/slab.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
> index a7ed60f..ccf496c 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.c
> +++ b/mm/slab.c
> @@ -2373,6 +2373,7 @@ __kmem_cache_create (struct kmem_cache *cachep, unsigned long flags)
> int err;
> size_t size = cachep->size;
>
> + flags &= ~CFLGS_OFF_SLAB;
A comment explaining why this is necessary wouldn't hurt.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists