[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120921183446.GH16522@beef>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:34:46 -0400
From: Matt Porter <mporter@...com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: "Hebbar, Gururaja" <gururaja.hebbar@...com>,
Linux DaVinci Kernel List
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
"Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@...com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linux Documentation List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Devicetree Discuss <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, Dan Williams <djbw@...com>,
Linux SPI Devel List
<spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Linux OMAP List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/13] ARM: davinci: move private EDMA API to
arm/common
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:42:05AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 09:33:42AM +0000, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 14:59:23, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:43:34AM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
> > > > Move mach-davinci/dma.c to common/edma.c so it can be used
> > > > by OMAP (specifically AM33xx atm) as well. This just moves
> > > > the private EDMA API but does not support OMAP.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Matt Porter <mporter@...com>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > > arch/arm/common/Kconfig | 3 +
> > > > arch/arm/common/Makefile | 1 +
> > > > arch/arm/common/edma.c | 1588 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > arch/arm/include/asm/mach/edma.h | 267 +++++
> > >
> > > asm/mach should not be used as a dumping ground for platform header files.
> > > It is there to provide the interfaces between generic ARM architecture
> > > code and platform code. (At least four files that are there at the
> > > moment need to be moved out of there - patch series to follow...)
> >
> > Can this be moved to include/linux/platform_data/ ?
>
> Here's the pertinant question: "is it platform data?" Looking at the
> file, it appears to be internal data structures and register definitions
> for the driver itself. Therefore, it isn't platform data, and it
> shouldn't be living separately from the driver.
>
> If the driver itself only makes use of the data structures, the data
> structures should be defined either within the driver, or a header file
> co-located next to the driver itself. The same goes for register
> definitions too.
>
> The only structure that I can find which isn't internal to the driver
> is struct edma_soc_info, struct edma_rsv_info, and the enum dma_event_q.
> Those can go to include/linux/platform_data, but the rest should not.
Ok, but is it ok to keep the actual private EDMA API portion in
arch/arm/include/asm/mach/? It's not a problem to move the internal
portions to a local include and that pdata to the appropriate place.
We still need a place independent of mach-davinci and mach-omap2 to
keep that portion of the include. I suppose it could be put in with
the dmaengine wrapper's include/linux/edma.h but I hate to clutter
that up when the private API will go away later.
-Matt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists