linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Xen backend support for paged out grant targets V4.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120921200521.GA20408@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date:	Fri, 21 Sep 2012 16:05:21 -0400
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andres.lagarcavilla@...il.com>
Cc:	Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@...dcentric.ca>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
	Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andres@...arcavilla.org>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Xen backend support for paged out grant targets V4.

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 03:30:01PM -0400, Andres Lagar-Cavilla wrote:
> On Sep 21, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 05:29:24AM -0400, Andres Lagar-Cavilla wrote:
> >> On Sep 17, 2012, at 4:17 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >> 
> >>> (I think I forgot to hit send on this on Friday, sorry. Also
> >>> s/xen.lists.org/lists.xen.org in the CC line…)
> >> I'm on a roll here…
> >> 
> >>> 
> >>> On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 15:26 +0100, Andres Lagar-Cavilla wrote:
> >>>> Since Xen-4.2, hvm domains may have portions of their memory paged out. When a
> >>>> foreign domain (such as dom0) attempts to map these frames, the map will
> >>>> initially fail. The hypervisor returns a suitable errno, and kicks an
> >>>> asynchronous page-in operation carried out by a helper. The foreign domain is
> >>>> expected to retry the mapping operation until it eventually succeeds. The
> >>>> foreign domain is not put to sleep because itself could be the one running the
> >>>> pager assist (typical scenario for dom0).
> >>>> 
> >>>> This patch adds support for this mechanism for backend drivers using grant
> >>>> mapping and copying operations. Specifically, this covers the blkback and
> >>>> gntdev drivers (which map foregin grants), and the netback driver (which copies
> >>> 
> >>>                          foreign
> >>> 
> >>>> foreign grants).
> >>>> 
> >>>> * Add a retry method for grants that fail with GNTST_eagain (i.e. because the
> >>>> target foregin frame is paged out).
> >>> 
> >>>         foreign
> >>> 
> >>>> * Insert hooks with appropriate wrappers in the aforementioned drivers.
> >>>> 
> >>>> The retry loop is only invoked if the grant operation status is GNTST_eagain.
> >>>> It guarantees to leave a new status code different from GNTST_eagain. Any other
> >>>> status code results in identical code execution as before.
> >>>> 
> >>>> The retry loop performs 256 attempts with increasing time intervals through a
> >>>> 32 second period. It uses msleep to yield while waiting for the next retry.
> >>> [...]
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andres@...arcavilla.org>
> >>> 
> >>> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
> >>> 
> >>> Since this is more about grant tables than netback this should probably
> >>> go via Konrad rather than Dave, is that OK with you Dave?
> >> 
> >> If that is the case hopefully Konrad can deal with the two typos? Otherwise happy to re-spin the patch.
> > 
> > So with this patch when I launch an PVHVM guest on Xen 4.1 I get this
> > in the initial domain and the guest is crashed:
> > 
> > [  261.927218] privcmd_fault: vma=ffff88002a31dce8 7f4edc095000-7f4edc195000, pgoff=c8, uv=00007f4edc15d000
> 
> With this patch? Or with the mmapbatch v2? This is a page fault in a foreign-mapped VMA. Not touched by this grant backend patch we are talking about.

This patch. But I also had a modified blkback. So let me double check
that it is not the persistent grants and this patch doing something naughty.

> 
> Does the hypervisor dump anything to its console?
> 
> At which point during xc_hvm_build do you see this? (or elsewhere in the toolstack?)

No idea. Didn't examine that much.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/