linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/11] x86: Supervisor Mode Access Prevention

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Sep 2012 18:08:18 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Linda Wang <lwang@...hat.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] x86: Supervisor Mode Access Prevention

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:43:04PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
 > Supervisor Mode Access Prevention (SMAP) is a new security feature
 > disclosed by Intel in revision 014 of the Intel® Architecture
 > Instruction Set Extensions Programming Reference:
 > 
 > http://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/319433-014.pdf
 > 
 > When SMAP is active, the kernel cannot normally access pages that are
 > user space (U=1).  Since the kernel does have the need to access user
 > space pages under specific circumstances, an override is provided: the
 > kernel can access user space pages if EFLAGS.AC=1.  For system data
 > structures, e.g. descriptor tables, that are accessed by the processor
 > directly, SMAP is active even in CPL 3 regardless of EFLAGS.AC.
 > 
 > SMAP also includes two new instructions, STAC and CLAC, to flip the AC
 > flag more quickly.

Perhaps add a printk somewhere to show that it's actually been enabled maybe ?

Also, would it be feasible to add something like we have for test_nx ?
If this feature regresses in some way in the future, I suspect we'd like
to know about it sooner rather than later.

	Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/